The Dodgers' recent decision to send Jack Suwinski to the minors has sparked curiosity and discussion among fans. But here's where it gets controversial... While Suwinski's performance has been less than stellar, with a .169 batting average over the last two seasons, the team's strategy raises questions. The Dodgers' decision to attempt to acquire Suwinski through waivers, despite his replacement-level performance, is intriguing. This move, however, didn't pan out with other players like Ben Rortvedt and Andy Ibáñez, who were also claimed off waivers. Now, Suwinski remains in the organization, providing outfield depth. This move leaves 39 players on the Dodgers' 40-man roster, and there's no immediate rush to fill the spot. But it does offer flexibility for future roster moves, such as if Rortvedt becomes available again or if non-roster invitees like Santiago Espinal or Cole Irvin make a strong case for a roster spot. So, what do you think? Is the Dodgers' strategy with Suwinski a smart move, or could it have been handled differently? Share your thoughts in the comments!
